Nevada professional responsibilities ·

When Nevada Insurance Guaranty Association Protection Applies

Not marked readNot yet practiced

Estimated study time. Take the time you need.

Introduction

An insurance policy is a promise to pay. Sometimes the insurance company fails and can't keep that promise. Nevada's insurance guaranty law (Nevada Revised Statutes, chapter 687A) gives the job of paying certain unpaid claims to the Nevada Insurance Guaranty Association (NIGA). NIGA is a backup payer that steps in for a failed insurer. Its money comes from assessments, which are required charges on its member insurers (the insurance companies that belong to the association).

NIGA is a safety net with conditions. It is not a blanket guarantee. It pays only when the law's conditions are met, and only up to the law's limits. This lesson teaches you to check those conditions in order.

By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

  • Decide whether a type of insurance falls under Nevada's guaranty law.
  • Tell whether an insurer counts as an "insolvent insurer" under Nevada law.
  • Decide whether a claim is a "covered claim," including the Nevada-connection and timing rules.
  • Spot amounts and claimants the law excludes.
  • Calculate the most NIGA will pay after other insurance is applied, and explain what NIGA can recover afterward.

Before you start: You should know what a certificate of authority and an insurer's domicile are. These are covered in Insurers: identity, domicile, authority and transactions. It also helps to know how a policy limit works, from Calculate deductibles, limits and coinsurance.

Assumptions used in every example: All people, companies and amounts are fictional. Unless an example says otherwise, assume there is no deductible, the policy's wording covers the loss, and there is no other insurance.

The Five Questions NIGA Protection Depends On

Before NIGA pays anything, five questions must all be answered "yes" or "within the limit":

  1. Policy type: Is this a kind of insurance the guaranty law reaches?
  2. Failed insurer: Does the insurer meet Nevada's legal definition of an insolvent insurer?
  3. Covered claim: Is this an unpaid claim the policy covered, with a Nevada connection, arising and filed in time?
  4. Exclusions: Is the amount or the claimant shut out by the law?
  5. Amount: After other insurance is used first, how much is left, and what cap applies?

The sections below take these one at a time.

Step 1: Which Policies the Guaranty Law Reaches

The law applies to direct insurance, meaning the policies an insurer issues to its own customers. There is one narrow exception written into another Nevada statute. The law also lists types of insurance it does not reach:

  • Life, annuity, health or disability insurance
  • Mortgage guaranty, financial guaranty, and other insurance protecting against investment risks
  • Fidelity or surety bonds and other bonding obligations. These are bonds that guarantee someone's honesty or performance.
  • Credit insurance, vendors' single interest insurance, collateral protection insurance, and similar insurance that protects a lender's interest in a loan
  • Insurance of warranties or service contracts, such as promises to repair or replace goods
  • Title insurance, which protects ownership rights in real estate
  • Ocean marine insurance, which covers ships and cargo at sea
  • Arrangements that move investment or credit risk without moving insurance risk
  • Insurance provided or guaranteed by a government entity

Homeowners, auto and commercial property policies are not on this list, so the guaranty law can apply to them.

Read the list exactly. It names ocean marine. It does not name inland marine, the coverage for valuable or mobile property taught in Inland marine: match valuable or mobile property to the right floater. An inland marine floater is not excluded by this list.

Check: Which of these could fall under Nevada's guaranty law? (a) a homeowners policy, (b) a title insurance policy, (c) a contractor's performance bond, (d) an inland marine floater on a photographer's cameras.

Show answer and explanation

(a) and (d) could fall under the law. Neither is on the exclusion list.

(b) is excluded because title insurance is named on the list. (c) is excluded because fidelity and surety bonds are named.

The tempting mistake is to exclude (d) because it contains the word "marine." Only ocean marine is excluded.

Passing this step does not mean NIGA will pay. It only means the policy type is eligible.

Step 2: When an Insurer Is Legally "Insolvent"

In ordinary speech, insolvent means "can't pay its debts." Under this law, insolvent insurer has a specific two-part meaning. An insurer qualifies only if it meets both parts.

Part A: Nevada authority. The insurer held a Nevada certificate of authority at a certain time. A certificate of authority is the Commissioner's permission to transact insurance in Nevada. The insurer must have held it either when the policy was issued or when the insured event occurred. The insured event is the event the policy responds to, such as a fire or a crash. Holding it at either time is enough.

Part B: Court action. The court must be in the insurer's state of domicile (its home state) or in Nevada. One of these must have happened:

  1. The court entered a final order of liquidation with a finding of insolvency. Liquidation means the court closes the company and its assets are gathered and distributed. The finding of insolvency is the court's decision that the company is insolvent.
  2. The insurer is in a court proceeding about its solvency, rehabilitation (a court-supervised attempt to repair the company), or liquidation. In that proceeding, the court has ordered the insurer to stop paying claims for more than 30 days.

Worked example. Desert Peak Mutual is downgraded by a rating agency. News stories call it "on the brink," and its claim payments slow down. None of these facts is a court order, so Desert Peak is not yet an insolvent insurer under this law.

Months later, a court in Desert Peak's home state enters a final liquidation order with a finding of insolvency. That satisfies Part B. Desert Peak held a Nevada certificate when it issued the policies, which satisfies Part A. Now Desert Peak is an insolvent insurer.

Change one fact at a time:

  • Suppose Desert Peak gave up its Nevada certificate before a customer's fire, but held it when the policy was issued. Part A is still met, because either time counts.
  • Suppose Desert Peak never held a Nevada certificate. It is not an insolvent insurer under Nevada's law, even if it is liquidated.
  • Suppose a rehabilitation court orders Desert Peak to stop paying claims for 20 days. That route requires more than 30 days, so Part B is not met that way.

Tempting mistake: "The insurer is in trouble, so NIGA pays." Financial trouble, rumors, or slow payment are not the test. The test is authority plus the specific court action.

Check: Truckee Valley Insurance held a Nevada certificate when it issued a policy. Its home-state court, while deciding whether to rehabilitate it, orders it to stop paying claims for 45 days. Separately, Pinyon Casualty never held a Nevada certificate. A Nevada court liquidates Pinyon with a finding of insolvency. Which insurer is an insolvent insurer under Nevada's law?

Show answer and explanation

Truckee Valley is an insolvent insurer. It meets Part A because it held a certificate when the policy was issued. It meets Part B through the second route: a solvency-related proceeding with a claim-payment stop longer than 30 days.

Pinyon has the strongest-sounding court order, but it fails Part A. It never had Nevada authority.

Both parts are always required. Neither part is enough alone.

Step 3: Covered Claims (the Unpaid Claims NIGA Can Pay)

A covered claim is an unpaid claim, or an unpaid court judgment, that the failed insurer's policy actually covered. It can also be a claim for unearned premium: premium you paid for coverage time you will no longer get.

For a claim to be a covered claim:

  • It must be unpaid.
  • It must arise out of, and be within the coverage of, a policy the guaranty law reaches (Step 1).
  • The insurer must be an insolvent insurer (Step 2).
  • The insolvent insurer must have issued the policy, or taken it over through an assumed claims transaction.
  • There must be a Nevada connection. Any one of these three is enough:
  • (a) The claimant or insured is a person who was a Nevada resident at the time of the insured event.
  • (b) The claimant or insured is a business or other entity whose principal place of business was in Nevada at the time of the insured event.
  • (c) For a first-party property damage claim, the damaged property is permanently located in Nevada.

Two neighboring terms. These answer different questions:

  • A first-party claim asks: What does my own policy owe me for my own loss? Example: your insured house burns.
  • A third-party claim asks: What does the insured's liability coverage owe someone the insured harmed? Example: a guest injured at the insured's store claims against the store's policy.

Connection (c) applies only to first-party property damage. For more on liability claims, see Recognize negligence and other bases of liability.

Worked example. Mara lives in Arizona and owns a rental house in Las Vegas, insured by Desert Peak. The house is damaged by fire. Mara is not a Nevada resident, so (a) does not apply. Mara is a person, not a business, so (b) does not apply. However, the claim is first-party property damage, and the house is permanently located in Nevada, so (c) supplies the connection.

Change one fact. Instead, Mara's car is damaged while they visit Nevada for a weekend. Mara is the sole claimant and the sole insured on this claim, so no other person or business could supply a connection under (a) or (b). The car is not permanently located in Nevada, and Mara is not a Nevada resident, so no connection exists.

Change a different fact. A Nevada resident's car is damaged on a trip to Utah. Connection (a) is met, because the claimant's residence at the time of the event counts, not where the loss happened.

Timing matters for (a) and (b). Residence and principal place of business are tested at the time of the insured event. Someone who moves to Nevada after the loss does not gain a connection by moving.

Unearned premium example. Policy assumption: the refund is the unused share of the period. Jo paid $1,800 for a 12-month policy. The insurer fails after 4 months. The unused share is 8 of 12 months, so the unearned premium is 8/12 × $1,800 = $1,200.

NIGA does not create coverage. A covered claim must be within the policy's coverage. If the policy excluded a loss, NIGA's law does not add coverage the policy never had.

Check: Which of these has the required Nevada connection? (1) An Oregon-incorporated business whose principal place of business was in Henderson when a customer was injured. (2) A person who lived in California when a storm damaged their California home, then moved to Reno the next month. (3) A Utah resident's cabin, permanently located near Lake Tahoe on the Nevada side, damaged by a falling tree.

Show answer and explanation

(1) has a connection through (b). The test is the principal place of business, not the state where the business was incorporated.

(2) has no connection. Residence is tested at the time of the insured event, and the property is not in Nevada.

(3) has a connection through (c). It is a first-party property damage claim for property permanently located in Nevada, even though the owner lives in Utah.

Step 4: The Coverage Window (When the Claim Must Arise)

Insured events keep happening after an insurer fails, so the law sets a window for which claims NIGA owes. Count from the date the insurer is determined to be insolvent, Day 0. NIGA is obligated for covered claims in either of two timing categories:

  • claims that existed before Day 0, or
  • claims that arise within 30 days after Day 0.

A claim needs to fit only one of these categories, not both.

For the second category, the window closes earlier if one of these comes first:

  • the policy's expiration date, if it is less than 30 days after Day 0
  • the date the insured replaces the policy
  • the date the insured asks to cancel the policy, if they do so within 30 days
Situation (Day 0 = insolvency determined) New claims must arise
Nothing else happens Within 30 days after Day 0
Policy expires on Day 10 Before Day 10
Insured buys a replacement policy on Day 8 Before Day 8

In every case, the 30-day window applies only until an earlier expiration, replacement, or requested cancellation closes it.

Tempting mistake 1: "The policy expired on Day 10, so 20 more days are left." No. The window ends at the earlier date. The 30 days do not continue after expiration or replacement.

Tempting mistake 2: "NIGA must pay within 30 days." No. This window is about when a claim arises, not how fast NIGA pays.

Step 5: The Filing Deadline (When the Claim Must Reach NIGA)

The coverage window and the filing deadline answer different questions:

  • The coverage window asks: When did the loss happen?
  • The filing deadline asks: When was the claim filed with NIGA?

Under the general rule, a claim is not a covered claim if it is filed with NIGA after the earlier of:

  • 25 months after the date of the liquidation order, or
  • the final date the court sets for filing claims against the failed insurer's liquidator or receiver (the person the court puts in charge of the failed company)

For example, if the court sets a final date 15 months after the liquidation order, then 15 months controls because it comes first.

A loss that is incurred but not reported is also excluded if it is not reported to NIGA before that deadline. Incurred but not reported means the loss already happened but nobody told NIGA. A claim for workers' compensation reopened under specific Nevada statutes is an exception to the deadline rule.

Check: Day 0 is the insolvency determination. Case A: the policy would expire on Day 50, the insured buys a new policy on Day 6, and a pipe bursts on Day 9. Case B: nothing changes, and a fire occurs on Day 22. In Case B, the liquidation order sets no special court deadline, and the claim is filed with NIGA 27 months after the liquidation order. Is either claim a covered claim?

Show answer and explanation

Case A: No. Replacing the policy on Day 6 closed the window, so a Day 9 loss arises outside it.

Case B: The Day 22 fire is inside the 30-day window. However, filing at 27 months misses the 25-month limit, which is the earlier deadline when the court sets none. So the claim is not a covered claim.

Passing one timing test does not excuse the other.

Step 6: Exclusions (What the Law Shuts Out)

Even a claim that passes Steps 1 through 5 can be wholly or partly excluded. There are two groups of exclusions: amounts and claimants.

Amounts that are never covered claims

  • Punitive or exemplary damages: extra money a court awards to punish, beyond compensating the loss
  • Fines or penalties paid to a government authority
  • Return of premium under a retrospective rating plan: a plan where the final premium is recalculated after the policy period based on the insured's losses
  • Amounts owed to other insurance entities: amounts due a reinsurer, insurer, insurance pool, underwriting association, HMO, hospital plan corporation, professional health service corporation, or self-insurer. This includes subrogation recoveries, reinsurance recoveries, contribution, or indemnification. Subrogation means one payer recovering from another party after paying. It is taught in Appraisal, other insurance and recovery rights.
  • Interest
  • Some attorney and provider fees:
  • fees for attorneys or other providers retained by the failed insurer or an insured before the insurer was determined insolvent
  • fees for attorneys or providers retained by an insured or claimant to pursue a claim against NIGA

Claimants shut out by size or relationship

Net worth is what an organization owns minus what it owes. It is measured on December 31 of the year before the insurer becomes insolvent. It includes the insured and all its subsidiaries and affiliates, combined (consolidated). Two different thresholds apply:

  • First-party claims are excluded if the insured's net worth exceeds $10,000,000.
  • Third-party claims under the policy are excluded if the insured's net worth exceeds $25,000,000.

Exceptions:

  • Neither net-worth exclusion applies to workers' compensation claims.
  • The $25,000,000 third-party exclusion does not apply when the insured itself is in insolvency proceedings. Examples include bankruptcy, a receivership, or a court order adjudicating it insolvent.

If an insured or claimant refuses NIGA's request for financial information, NIGA may treat their net worth as above the applicable threshold.

Other claimant exclusions:

  • A first-party claim by an affiliate of the failed insurer is excluded. An affiliate is a company connected by ownership or control, with 10% or more ownership counting.
  • A claim is excluded when the claimant's home state guaranty association has already denied coverage because of that state's net-worth limit.

Worked example. Sagebrush Supply has a consolidated net worth of $12,000,000.

  • Its own warehouse fire is a first-party claim. $12,000,000 exceeds $10,000,000, so the claim is excluded.
  • A customer injured at its store makes a third-party claim. $12,000,000 does not exceed $25,000,000, so the claim is not excluded by net worth.

Change one fact. At $30,000,000, the third-party claim is also excluded, unless Sagebrush itself is in bankruptcy or similar insolvency proceedings.

Tempting mistake: Using one number for both claim types. Check first whether the claim is first-party or third-party, then apply the matching threshold.

Check: A court judgment against a Nevada resident's failed insurer awards $80,000 for the injured claimant's losses, $40,000 in punitive damages, and $6,000 in interest. The claim otherwise qualifies, and the policy limit is $100,000. Which part can be a covered claim?

Show answer and explanation

Only the $80,000 can be a covered claim. Punitive damages and interest are excluded amounts, even though they are part of the same judgment.

The excluded pieces come out of the claim before you apply any limits. Here, $80,000 is under both the $100,000 policy limit and the $300,000 cap taught in Step 7.

Step 7: Payment Limits (the Most NIGA Will Pay)

NIGA's payment is capped by claim type:

Claim type Most NIGA pays
Workers' compensation, under the listed Nevada chapters The entire claim amount
Return of unearned premium $10,000 per policy
Any other covered claim The policy limit or $300,000, whichever is less, per occurrence (per event)

There is also an overriding rule: NIGA never pays more than the failed insurer would have owed under the policy. A cap is a ceiling, not an automatic payment.

Worked examples (fully covered losses, no deductible):

  • Example A: Loss $500,000, policy limit $400,000. The insurer would have owed $400,000. The cap is the lesser of $400,000 and $300,000, which is $300,000. NIGA pays $300,000.
  • Example B: Same loss, but the policy limit is $200,000. The lesser of $200,000 and $300,000 is $200,000. NIGA pays $200,000.
  • Example C: Policy limit $400,000, actual loss $70,000. The insurer would have owed only $70,000. NIGA pays $70,000, not $300,000.
  • Example D: Unearned premium of $12,000 on one policy. NIGA pays $10,000.

Tempting mistake: "NIGA pays $300,000." It pays up to $300,000. It never pays more than the policy limit or the amount actually owed.

Defense of the insured. For liability claims, NIGA may also defend the insured. That duty ends when NIGA pays, or tenders (formally offers), the lesser of its cap or the applicable policy limit.

Step 8: Use Other Insurance First

The law requires a claimant to exhaust (use up) other insurance that applies to the same facts, injury or loss before NIGA pays. This includes any right to a defense under the other policy. These also count as other coverage:

  • a liability policy of someone who may be jointly responsible with the failed insurer's insured
  • claims against HMOs and similar health plans
  • amounts payable by a self-insurer

NIGA's payment is then reduced:

  • by the full applicable stated limit of the other policy, even if the claimant collected less from it, or
  • if the other coverage has no stated limit, by the total amount actually recovered.

The claimant never has to exhaust rights under the failed insurer's own policy.

Worked example. Lena, a Nevada resident, has $90,000 of covered damage to their shop. The damage was caused by a contractor whose liability insurer, FailCo, is now insolvent. FailCo's policy limit is $100,000. Lena's own property policy also covers this damage; assume its applicable stated limit for this loss is $50,000.

  1. Lena must claim under their own policy first.
  2. NIGA's payment is reduced by the full $50,000 stated limit.
  3. $90,000 − $50,000 = $40,000. This is under both FailCo's $100,000 limit and the $300,000 cap, so NIGA pays $40,000.

Change one fact. Lena settles with their own insurer for only $35,000. NIGA still receives the full $50,000 credit, so it still pays $40,000. The $15,000 shortfall does not shift to NIGA.

The insured's side. Whatever reduction applies to NIGA also reduces the contractor's own liability to Lena by the same amount.

More than one state's association. If a claim could be recovered from more than one state's guaranty association, the claimant goes first to:

  • the association of the insured's residence, as the general rule
  • the association where the property is permanently located, for first-party damage to such property
  • the association of the claimant's residence, for workers' compensation

Any recovery from NIGA is reduced by what another association paid.

Step 9: After NIGA Pays: Assignment and Recovery

When someone recovers from NIGA, they are treated as having assigned (handed over) their rights under the policy to NIGA, up to the amount NIGA paid. They must also cooperate with NIGA just as they would have with the insurer. NIGA also takes on the failed insurer's rights on those claims, such as salvage and subrogation against others, to the extent it has paid.

Can NIGA demand repayment from the insured? As a general rule, no. NIGA has no cause of action against the failed insurer's insured for sums it paid. The exceptions are:

  • any claim the failed insurer itself would have had against the insured if it had paid
  • the insured's consolidated net worth, including affiliates, exceeded $10,000,000 on December 31 of the year before the insolvency
  • NIGA paid in error
  • the payment went to an affiliate of the failed insurer

Worked example. Basin Freight has a consolidated net worth of $15,000,000. An injured motorist's third-party claim against Basin is not excluded, because $15,000,000 does not exceed $25,000,000. NIGA pays $120,000. Basin's net worth exceeds $10,000,000, so NIGA may recover the $120,000 from Basin. It cannot recover more than it paid.

Tempting mistake: Using $25,000,000 here. That figure decides whether a third-party claim is excluded. The repayment rule uses $10,000,000.

Practice on Your Own

1. Kai, a Reno resident, has a homeowners policy with Silver Mesa Insurance, which held a Nevada certificate when it issued the policy. Kai's garage burns. Twelve days later, Silver Mesa's home-state court enters a final liquidation order with a finding of insolvency. The covered damage is $320,000, and the dwelling limit is $250,000. Kai files with NIGA 3 months after the liquidation order, which is also before the final date the court set for filing claims against Silver Mesa's liquidator. How much can NIGA pay?

Show answer and explanation

Check each condition in order:

  • Policy type: Homeowners is not on the exclusion list.
  • Insurer: Silver Mesa meets both parts of the definition (authority when issued, plus a final liquidation order with a finding of insolvency).
  • Covered claim: The claim is unpaid and covered. The Nevada connection is Kai's residence at the time of the fire.
  • Timing: The claim existed before the insolvency determination, so it falls in an eligible timing category. It also passes both filing tests: 3 months is well within 25 months after the liquidation order, and the filing came before the court's final filing date. Because the deadline is whichever of those two dates comes first, the claim had to meet both, and it does.

Amount: The lesser of $250,000 and $300,000 is $250,000. The insurer would have owed $250,000. NIGA pays $250,000, not $300,000 and not $320,000.

2. A commercial property policy has a $350,000 limit. A covered fire causes $600,000 of damage. On a different failed policy, a customer is owed $14,000 of unearned premium. What are NIGA's maximum payments?

Show answer and explanation
  • Fire: The lesser of $350,000 and $300,000 is $300,000.
  • Unearned premium: The cap is $10,000 per policy, so NIGA pays $10,000, not $14,000.

Each claim type has its own cap.

3. Day 0 is the insolvency determination. A policy expires on Day 45. The insured asks the failed insurer to cancel on Day 12. A hailstorm damages the insured's roof on Day 20. Is this a covered claim?

Show answer and explanation

No. The policy's Day 45 expiration does not matter here, because the 30-day window would close first anyway. The cancellation request on Day 12 closed the window even earlier. A Day 20 loss falls outside it.

Find the earliest closing date among Day 30, expiration, replacement, and requested cancellation.

4. Canyon Tools has a consolidated net worth of $11,000,000. Its failed insurer covered both its building and its liability. It has (a) a first-party claim for storm damage to its Nevada warehouse and (b) a third-party claim from an injured visitor, which NIGA pays at $90,000. What happens to each?

Show answer and explanation

(a) is excluded. A first-party claim with net worth above $10,000,000 is not a covered claim, even though the warehouse is in Nevada.

(b) is not excluded, because $11,000,000 does not exceed the $25,000,000 third-party threshold. But because Canyon's net worth exceeds $10,000,000, NIGA may recover the $90,000 from Canyon after paying.

The two thresholds answer different questions. $25,000,000 decides third-party eligibility. $10,000,000 decides first-party eligibility and NIGA's right to be repaid.

5. Rosa's covered loss is $70,000, and the failed insurer's policy limit is $150,000. Rosa's own separate policy applies to the same loss with a stated applicable limit of $25,000, but Rosa collects only $18,000 from it. How much can NIGA pay?

Show answer and explanation

NIGA receives credit for the full stated limit, not the amount Rosa actually collected:

$70,000 − $25,000 = $45,000

That is under the $150,000 policy limit and the $300,000 cap. Subtracting the $18,000 actually received is the tempting mistake.

6. A failed insurer's liquidation order is dated January 1. The court sets the final date for filing claims at 15 months after the order. A claimant files with NIGA 20 months after the order. Is the claim on time?

Show answer and explanation

No. The deadline is the earlier of 25 months or the court's final date. Here that is 15 months, so a filing at 20 months is late. The 25-month figure is an outer limit, not a guaranteed period.

What to Remember

  • NIGA is a conditional backup payer under NRS chapter 687A, not a blanket guarantee.
  • Policy type: The law reaches direct insurance except listed types, including life and health, surety bonds, title, ocean marine, warranties, credit-related coverage, and government-provided insurance.
  • Insolvent insurer: The insurer held Nevada authority (when the policy was issued or at the insured event) and faces a qualifying court order. That means final liquidation with a finding of insolvency, or a court order stopping claim payments for more than 30 days. News of financial trouble is not enough.
  • Covered claim: An unpaid, policy-covered claim or judgment (including unearned premium) with a Nevada connection. The connection is Nevada residence or principal place of business at the time of the insured event, or Nevada-located property for first-party property damage.
  • Timing:
  • The claim must exist before, or arise within 30 days after, the insolvency determination. Expiration, replacement, or a requested cancellation can close that window sooner.
  • The claim must be filed by the earlier of 25 months after liquidation or the court's deadline.
  • Exclusions:
  • Amounts: punitive damages, fines, interest, retrospective-rating premium returns, amounts owed to other insurance entities, and specified fees.
  • Claimants: first-party claims above $10,000,000 net worth, third-party claims above $25,000,000 (with exceptions), and first-party claims by the failed insurer's affiliates.
  • Limits:
  • Workers' compensation: the full claim.
  • Unearned premium: up to $10,000 per policy.
  • Other claims: the lesser of the policy limit or $300,000 per occurrence.
  • Never more than the failed insurer owed.
  • Other insurance first: NIGA gets credit for the other policy's full stated limit.
  • After paying: NIGA takes over the claimant's policy rights to the extent it paid. It can seek repayment from the insured only in listed cases, such as a consolidated net worth above $10,000,000 or a payment made in error.

Lesson questions

No lesson quiz questions are available yet.

Reading on this device

This reading marker stays in this browser. It is not a saved account quiz result or mastery evidence.

Save your reading place

Reading progress is separate from quiz performance.

Create an account to save your reading or sign in. All lesson text stays available without signing in.

More practice

Practice has its own access rules. It does not change access to this lesson.

See practice options

Lesson contents